• Skip to main content

MedicalPrices.co.uk

September 11, 2022

“Wasted” US Healthcare Spending Is The World’s 13th Biggest Economy At $1.5 Trillion – Greater Than Total Australian GDP

The map below divides the world between countries with economies that are larger or smaller than $1.5 trillion, the amount the US “wastes” on healthcare each year. Only 12 countries have economies above $1.5 trillion, which means “wasted” US healthcare spending would be the world’s 13th biggest economy, just ahead of Spain and Australia.

The methodology is outlined below including most importantly how “waste” is defined.

Wasted US Healthcare Spending Is The World's 13th Biggest Economy At $1.5 Trillion - Greater Than Total Australian GDP

Map showing which countries have larger or smaller economies than “wasted” US healthcare spending. (created using MapChart.net)

Data & Methodology

According to the World Bank the US spends by far the most on healthcare per capita (public and private combined) at $9,869.74 annually ($PPP; 2016), well ahead of number 2 Switzerland at $7,867.39.

For reference world average healthcare spending per capita (in $PPP) is just $1,355.61, which means the US spends over 7X the world average.

One way looking at waste would be to compare how much more the US spends above the world average which equals $8,514.13 ($9,869.74 – $7,867.39) per person or about $2.8 trillion. However, this is pretty unsatisfactory because the US has better than average world health outcomes.

According to the World Health Organization in 2015, the US currently ranks 31st in terms of overall life expectancy (men and women combined) at 79.3 years (81.6 years for women and 76.9 years for men). However, every other country with better life expectancy, except Costa Rica ($1,248.55), spends more than $1,355.61 per capita on healthcare.

However, if we look at current health expenditure as a percentage of GDP, we find something a little more interesting.

Again according to the World Bank, US spending at 17.07% of GDP is second only to the Marshall Islands (23.29% of GDP) in terms of the share of the economy devoted to healthcare.

Thus, total US healthcare spending is around $3.6 trillion using current 2019 GDP figures from the IMF (17.07% of $21.3 trillion).

This means total US healthcare spending would be the world’s 5th biggest economy, ahead of India with a population 1.3 billion people. Only the US, China, Japan and Germany have larger economies.

Total US Healthcare Spending Compared To World Economies

Map showing which countries have economies that are larger or smaller than total US healthcare spending (created using MapChart.net)

How is “wasted” healthcare spending defined?

So how did we arrive at $1.5 trillion being “wasted?”

The current world average health expenditure as percentage of GDP is 10.02% (which it should be noted includes US spending which brings the average up).

Therefore, we’ve defined “waste” as the difference between what the US spends (17.07% of GDP) and the world average (10.02%) to get a figure of 7.05% of GDP, which works out to roughly $1.5 trillion using 2019 IMF GDP figures.

This is larger than the GDP of Spain or Australia ($1.4 trillion each) or the entire GDP of Indonesia (population 268 million).

However, is this a fair measure?

Well let’s look at the 30 countries with a higher life expectancy than the US and the percentage of GDP they devote to healthcare spending (countries in bold spend below world average).

  1. Japan – 83.7 years; 10.93% of GDP
  2. Switzerland – 83.4 years; 12.25% of GDP
  3. Singapore – 83.1 years; 4.47% of GDP
  4. Australia – 82.8 years; 9.25% of GDP
  5. Spain – 82.8 years; 8.97% of GDP
  6. Iceland – 82.7 years; 8.29% of GDP
  7. Italy – 82.7 years; 8.94% of GDP
  8. Israel – 82.5 years; 7.31% of GDP
  9. Sweden – 82.4 years; 10.93% of GDP
  10. France – 82.4 years; 11.54% of GDP
  11. South Korea – 82.3 years; 7.34% of GDP
  12. Canada – 82.2 years; 10.53% of GDP
  13. Luxembourg – 82.0 years; 6.16% of GDP
  14. Netherlands – 81.9 years; 10.36% of GDP
  15. Norway – 81.8 years; 10.50% of GDP
  16. Malta – 81.7 years; 9.30% of GDP
  17. New Zealand – 81.6 years; 9.22% of GDP
  18. Austria – 81.5 years; 10.44% of GDP
  19. Ireland – 81.4 years; 7.38% of GDP
  20. United Kingdom – 81.2 years; 9.76% of GDP
  21. Belgium – 81.1 years; 10.04% of GDP
  22. Finland – 81.1 years; 9.49% of GDP
  23. Portugal – 81.1 years; 9.08% of GDP
  24. Germany – 81.0 years; 11.14% of GDP
  25. Greece – 81.0 years; 8.45% of GDP
  26. Slovenia – 80.8 years; 8.47% of GDP
  27. Denmark – 80.6 years; 10.35% of GDP
  28. Cyprus – 80.5 years; 6.88% of GDP
  29. Chile – 80.5 years; 8.53% of GDP
  30. Costa Rica – 79.6 years; 7.56% of GDP

Therefore, 19 out of the 30 countries with better life expectancies than the US spend below the world average on healthcare as a share of GDP with Singapore at just 4.47% of GDP getting by far the best value for money of any country. Moreover, most other countries are only spending fraction over the world average.

Finally the numbers for the United States look even worse when you consider that the latest Census Bureau figures show that 27.5 million Americans (more than the population of Australia) or 8.5% of the population lack any health insurance whatsoever.

What do you think? Please share your thoughts below and share this post with someone you think might find it interesting.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Tom Cahill says

    September 27, 2019 at 6:48 pm

    Excellent ! Would be good to continue this analysis and break out where the money is going. In particular, health insurance costs versus costs of actual delivery of health care. Kudos for including some basic measure of health outcome with the dollar figures. When discussing “health care”, at least in the US, I think it is always good to distinguish clearly between health insurance, health care delivery and actual health of the intended recipients. In the US, I think the expectation of receiving quality health care services is very high, plus most citizen still expect the health care system to deliver good health to them and many don’t take personal responsibility for their own health. And with all of the profit driven players in the health care insurance AND delivery industries, the results are sadly predictable. Question is: how long can the US economy sustain this situation ? Not much longer, I’m afraid.

    Reply
  2. *M*e*g*a* says

    November 5, 2019 at 6:32 pm

    Is this an atrocity?

    Reply
  3. Paul Irving says

    August 14, 2024 at 11:10 am

    Luxembourg’s health spending is affected by the fact that a large proportion of Luxembourg’s workforce lives outside the country, & commutes across the border to work. Their production is counted as part of Luxembourg’s GDP, but most of their spending & consumption takes place in Belgium, France or Germany. They & their families probably go to hospital, school, etc. where they live.

    Ireland also has an inflated GDP, though much of it’s for different reasons. A lot of corporate profits are declared in Ireland, but not earned there. There are companies registered in Ireland & making large profits there, which count towards Ireland’s GDP, which may have only a nameplate on a lawyer’s or accountant’s wall & a bank account as their presence in the country. Others, such as Apple, have a real presence, but it only accounts for a tiny proportion of the company’s declared profits in Ireland. Most comes from products designed, made, & sold in other countries. In the mid-2010s a change in Apple’s internal accounting increased Ireland’s official GDP by over 10% – but almost none of that increase ever touched Ireland in any meaningful way. It passed through bank accounts registered in Ireland (but possibly hosted on servers elsewhere) – & that’s it.

    Adjust the GDPs of Luxembourg & Ireland for those anomalies & their health spending as a share of GDP would increase considerably. Ireland’s central statistical office calculates, & publishes, an alternative measure (called Modified GNI, or GNI*) which it prefers for most purposes. ESA (the EU statistical office) has approved it for some EU purposes. Using it would increase health spending to close to the world average.

    https://www.cso.ie/en/interactivezone/statisticsexplained/nationalaccountsexplained/modifiedgni/

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Content Disclaimer: MedicalPrices.co.uk is a medical and health price research and information website only. We are not affiliated with the NHS and do not offer any medical and/or health advice. Please speak with a doctor and/or other medical professional before purchasing any medical and/or health treatments, products and/or services. This website uses affiliate links and works with some online sellers of medicine. This helps keep the website free, but may mean we earn a commission if you visit any website featured and purchase something.

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Copyright © 2025 Brilliant British Ltd trading as MedicalPrices.co.uk

Registered Office Address:
3rd Floor Great Titchfield House, 14-18 Great Titchfield Street, London, United Kingdom, W1W 8BD
Company number 10490224